Search for: "Christoph v. United States" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Thursday rejected a proposed class-action lawsuit against Evansville, Ind. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:47 pm
United States, which President Bush supported, and the President's decision to commute Scooter Libby's prison sentence. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:32 am
Posted by Christopher OnstottThe United States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit recently ruled that the right to assert a claim based upon a past violation of the Family and Medical Rights Act of 1993 (“FMLA”) may not be waived. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
From Japan to the United States and beyond, karaoke is wildly popular. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
")But I think that we are going to see many more German copyrights exploited in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:31 am
Weingaertner and Christopher C. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:53 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeNo Concerns Raised for Post-Trial Inquiry of Juror Whose Letter to Court Concerned Other, Pregnant Juror United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
Although the Supreme Court did not accept KSR's submissions in full, it unanimously agreed that they were correct on the facts of tbe dispute before it.On the background to this ruling and the TSM test, see Patently-O hereOn yesterday's ruling see Patently-O, Patent Baristas and and Duncan BucknellMicrosoft Corp v AT & T was a 7-1 ruling (Justice John Paul Stephens dissenting) that allowed Microsoft's appeal and agreed that the company should not be held liable for… [read post]