Search for: "City of Ontario" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 6:47 am by Adam Santucci
On June 17, 2010 the United States Supreme Court issued the highly anticipated decision City of Ontario v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:29 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
North Hollywood, CA 91607 Bella Vista Health Care Center 933 East Deodar Street Ontario, CA 91764 COLORADO – CO Camellia Healthcare Center 500 Geneva Street Aurora, CO 80010 Pueblo Care and Rehab 2611 Jones Avenue Pueblo, CO 81004 CONNECTICUT – CT St. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
In the case, Sergeant Jeff Quon, a SWAT team officer, received a pager from the City of Ontario, to be used for sending work text messages. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:23 am by Anna Christensen
  The case pages for City of Ontario v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
Jeff Quon, as a member of the city of Ontario, California’s SWAT team, was assigned an alphanumeric pager, capable of sending text messages. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
City of Ontario, the US Supreme Court last week dodged that issue entirely, stating that regardless of what Quon’s expectations should have been, the fact that the search was “motivated by a legitimate work-related purpose” saved it. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm by Ethan Ackerman
Supreme Court released its opinion in City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:14 pm
  And yes, I'm aware of the fact that the City of Ontario didn't have such a policy, and they won their case anyway. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:40 pm by William Morriss
As described in this article from Computer World, the Supreme Court has issued its decision in City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 4:51 pm
Unless you've been living in a cave (a cave that doesn't have access to Lawffice Space), you already know that the Supreme Court decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
The Supreme Court has decided its first case on workplace electronic monitoring, City of Ontario, California v. [read post]