Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 1621 - 1640 of 12,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 7:53 am
 There was a happy ending of sorts for the Lithuanian company, though: it finally got a CTM for goods in class 32, this being figurative 'Nueva Melt water original' mark. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:33 pm by Sai Vinod
Pursuant to this I&B Ministry will auction 839 new FM radio channels this year. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Because 'the well-pleaded facts do not permit [this] [C]ourt to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged but it has not "shown"—'that the pleader is entitled to relief."' [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
  Dilution by blurring, codified in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(2)(B), arises when association with another similar mark causes the distinctiveness of the famous mark to be compromised. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:51 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
But this provision has to be read together with Section 14(1A), which states:“[(1A) No licence under sub-clause (c) of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) shall be granted to a person other than a Department of the Central Government or any authority or an institution or a corporation established by the Central Government, or a Government company. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
 That endless story should have finally come to an end today, with the decision that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued in Joined Cases C-581/13 P and C-582/13 P. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
If a company holds a trade mark registration consisting of a heart for pharmaceutical drugs, would it then be permissible for that same company to register that identical logo for cardiovascular research services? [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Not useful to try to circumscribe; not in statute; economically destructive b/c it prevents change from 1998 configurations. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:07 pm
Medicare plans A and B cover only a portion of medical costs. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:05 pm by Gene Takagi
According to the regulations: “An investment shall be considered as made primarily to accomplish one or more of the purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B) if it significantly furthers the accomplishment of the private foundation’s exempt activities and if the investment would not have been made but for such relationship between the investment and the accomplishment of the foundation’s exempt activities. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:06 pm
A 2002 survey revealed that the easement for lot C actually ran through a house on Lot B. [read post]