Search for: "Cooper v. United States" Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by WIMS
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Scott Bomboy
United States decision, Chicago believed the 10th Amendment “prohibits the federal government from… command[ing] the States’ officers . . . to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 8:44 am by Conrad Dryland
Conrad Dryland serves as Attorney Advisor, Congressional Liaison & Special Counsel to the Chair at the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:50 pm by PaulKostro
“[A] parent’s rights to the care and companionship of his or her child are so fundamental as to be guaranteed protection under the First, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
”[12] In its brief, Canada points to the long history of Canada-U.S. cooperation[13] and that it was the United States which pursued the 1977 pipeline treaty to protect a pipeline running from Alaska through Canadian territory to the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am by John Jascob
SEC, the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the SEC’s administrative law judges (“ALJ”) are “officers of the United States,” and thereby subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCRIMINAL PRACTICENo Reversible Error in Decision Not to Re-Sentence Pursuant to 'Crosby' After Remand United States, appellee v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by John Hopkins
A recent article in e-discovery Law Review about the case of the United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-1059, which presents what may be the most specific criminal-law question in the history of the world. [read post]