Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 1621 - 1640 of 48,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent decision of Master Leonard in Douglas v Ministry of Justice & Anor [2018] EWHC B2 (Costs) concerned the issue of the recoverability of the costs of attending an inquest. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:05 pm by Simon Gibbs
Interesting costs webinar from Gatehouse Chambers’ Costs and Litigation Funding Team examining the Consumer Rights Act 2015 in light of the recent decision in Glaser v Atay [2024] EWCA Civ 1111. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Ray Beckerman
In Real View v. 20-20, an "actual damages" copyright infringement case, the Court held that the actual damages for an unauthorized download of a computer program was limited to the cost of an actual license fee, and reduced the jury's much higher verdict accordingly.The judge, in the District of Massachusetts, granted remittitur, reducing the jury's verdict of $1,370,590.00 to $4,200.00, unless the plaintiff seeks a new trial.Decision on damagesCommentary &… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Circuit noted the employer was not self-insured and there was no evidence decisionmakers knew any employee’s medical costs; that the employee failed to show her costs (rather than the costs of a group of employees) impacted premiums; and that there was no temporal proximity nor discussions about costs or other evidence suggesting she was fired to reduce costs (Giles v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, had he gone with a union-appointed attorney, the employer would have been contractually bound to pay the costs (Suazo v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:39 am
R (Perinpanathan) v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court; [2009] WLR (D) 92 “In exercising its power under s 64(1) Magistrates' Court Act 1980 to make ’such order as to costs … as it thinks just and reasonable’ a magistrates' court was entitled, when dismissing forfeiture proceedings, to take into account its view that the application had [...] [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:55 am
Applicant free not to pursue appeal to House of Lords Regina (Jones) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
 Newnham College v Revenue and Customs Commissioners House of Lords ” A scheme by which Newnham College, Cambridge, set up a company, which it owned and controlled, to which it leased its newly constructed library for the company to operate, was effective as a device to enable the college to recover the input tax attributable to the cost of building the library pursuant to paragraph 2 of Schedule 10 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:14 am by sally
Regina (Law Society) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 1406; [2010] WLR (D) 151 “When exercising the discretionary power to make provision for scales or rates of payments of any costs payable out of central funds to successful defendants in criminal trials pursuant to ss 16(6) and 20 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, as amended, the Lord Chancellor had to base the rules on the principle of compensation taking into account prevailing market rates. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:37 am by tracey
 Yerrakalva v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and another; [2011] EWCA civ 1255;  [2011] WLR (D)  313 “When exercising its discretion under rule 40 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 to order costs against a party who had acted unreasonably in bringing or conducting proceedings, it was vital that the employment tribual looked at the whole picture of what happened in the… [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]