Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 40,826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 1:49 am
Despite the need for general guidance on the legal principles in play in determining whether something constitutes a “building”, the relevant test is that laid down in Skerritts of Nottingham v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions [2000] JPL 1025 and as adopted in the Listed Buildings Act. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:51 am
That too is common relief on appeal, and the mootness inquiry comes down to its effectiveness. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:23 am
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:11 pm
” The case, Mohamed, et al., v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 8:20 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
The High Court has handed down Judgment in Vitol SA v Beta Renowable SA [2017] EWHC 1734 (Comm) highlighting the importance of ensuring that communication and conduct for the purpose of accepting repudiatory breach is clear and unambiguous. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:56 am
It is being handed down and should be read with the Court’s judgment in R (on the application A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 37, which sets out the principles governing this area. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:36 pm
In the ongoing fight over the use and enforceability of collective action waivers, the stage has been set for the United States Supreme Court to weigh in and hopefully offer clarity to labor law practitioners and employers. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:07 pm
In a decision issued a few minutes ago, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the NLRB’s new election rules because the Board lacked a quorum when it attempted to adopt the final rule. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
Such was the case for plaintiff in Hodson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
On 23 April 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the appeal arising from the January 2023 decision of Meade J in AIM v Supponor [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
I was in state court this morning. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:00 am
One example is the case of Feltington v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:23 pm
Doe, a case in which the United States Supreme Court struck down a school policy establishing an election mechanism that enabled student-led prayers before football games. [read post]
