Search for: "FRANCIS v. FRANCIS" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
After some rapid education (thanks Francis), not having actually dealt with shared ownership lease possession proceedings, this makes a certain sense. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:18 pm
I wouldn't start the opinion -- as Judge Schroeder does -- with the following sentence: "This is a death penalty appeal by California state prisoner, and crack marksman, Thomas Francis Edwards. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:27 pm
Ryan II: Delaware Chancery Court Denies Interlocutory Appeal Last Friday, Vice Chancellor Noble of the Delaware Chancery Court issued a letter opinion in Ryan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:16 am
posted by Gary Rosin The recent opinion by the Delaware Chancery court in Ryan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:22 am
Teleflex.Of the idea of having an "innovative invention," note text by Francis X. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 4:10 pm
  Duties of Outside Directors Under Delaware Law: As noted by the ever-vigilant Francis Pileggi on his Delaware and Commercial Litigation Blog (here), on July 29, 2008, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an opinion in the Ryan v Lyondell Chemical Company case (opinion here) that has important implications for the duties and potential liabilities of outside directors in the merger and acquisition context. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog So you want to start your own business... - Des Moines attorney Liz Overton of Sullivan & Ward in the firm's Iowa Law Blog New DOT regulation requires expanded observed urination in drug testing - Portland lawyer Dennis Westlind of Stoel Rives in the firm's World of Work Blog Another FLP fact pattern: Holman v. [read post]