Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 27,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 12:06 pm by JURIST Staff
” In this regard, it is crucial to examine the judgment rendered in Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Beth Hillman
Yesterday’s program at the Rhodes Conference on military jurisdiction saw more debate on the wisdom and practicality of civilian v. military jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a good day for fair jury selection in the State of California, the California Supreme Court reversed a conviction in a criminal case where a prosecutor used 10 out of 16 peremptory challenges to bump Hispanics off of the jury pool. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
In a good day for fair jury selection in the State of California, the California Supreme Court reversed a conviction in a criminal case where a prosecutor used 10 out of 16 peremptory challenges to bump Hispanics off of the jury pool. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:20 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Recently, the law was subject to Supreme Court review in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:06 pm
As is well known, the House of Lords in Stack v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Same-sex marriage was not legal in New York, and they did not have the resources to travel out of state. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court made this ruling in a 7-2 decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:07 pm
" The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the breach of contract claim because the complaint failed to allege the defendant promised the plaintiff it would restrict competing gift stores to four stores.Analyzing the claim for breach of express and implied covenants, the Court of Appeals stated "an implied covenant to refrain from destructive competition may be inferred from a percentage lease, based on the duty of good faith and fair dealing, where the intentions… [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Giving the leading majority judgment Lady Hale stated that, following the well-established justification test, the criterion had to be considered in light of whether it has a legitimate aim to which it was rationally connected, and whether there was no less intrusive measure that could have been used instead after a fair balance had been struck between the rights of the individuals concerned and the interests of the community. [read post]