Search for: "Files v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 91,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Nero v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:59 am
James Madison Project v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Since MHCS’ trade mark has been filed prior to the accession of several Member States to the EU in 2004, 2007 and 2013, MHCS will not have to establish acquired distinctiveness for these ‘new Member States’ (Art. 209(4)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
That should have been the end of this sorry saga, except that now, five months later, Atari has filed a federal lawsuit against State Farm and its ad agencies. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
Howell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:44 am
” Cavitt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
Staszak v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 1:02 pm
Sullivan (1964), and Crowell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
The plaintiff states in this case (like the ones in Biden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:21 am
In Youngclaus v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:36 am
The recent jury verdict in Menninger v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:36 am
The recent jury verdict in Menninger v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:56 pm
§ 252.204-7012 (often referred to as the “DFARS Cyber Clause” or “DFARS 7012 Clause”)Emergency ServicesAny entity that provides one or more of the following emergency services or functions to a population of 50,000 or more individuals: (i) law enforcement, (ii) fire and rescue, (iii) emergency medical services, (iv) emergency management, or (v) public works that contribute to public health and safetyEnergyAny entity required to report cybersecurity incidents… [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:11 pm
Hunt v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
As our readers are aware, a flurry of eavesdropping lawsuits have been filed in the wake of the Ninth Circuit decision in Javier v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
