Search for: "GLASS v. STATE"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,818
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Almost two years ago, in State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Turning to free speech issues, the Court struck down state laws that banned ads featuring the price of beer and other alcoholic beverages in 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
’” Glass v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Green & Joseph Oluwole, Hein v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:25 am
Both were highly intoxicated by that time, Bitsy having consumed five Margaritas and four glasses of wine. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:47 am
Harvey v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
” Glass v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 1:45 pm
V BROWN. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Rasberry v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:00 pm
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:37 pm
The Amendment further overturns two United States Supreme Court decisions: Sutton v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The technology was, in this context, not unconvincingly analogized by the Court to a searchlight, a marine glass, or a field glass (id. at 283, citing United States v Lee, 274 US 559, 563 [1927]). [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:39 pm
On May 7, 2009, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in Bauer v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:02 pm
Second, we must ask whether each argument justifies its conclusion, or whether there is reason to see the argument as a rationalization of some deeper sort of anxiety or aversion ("animus", to use the language of Romer v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:04 pm
" In Gallo v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
