Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2011, 5:02 pm
One case in which judgment is awaited stands out – Von Hannover v Germany (No.2), heard by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights over a year ago, on 13 October 2010. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:35 pm
Goldberg v Voigt [2020] NSWDC 174. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:11 pm
Cairns v Modi; KC v MGN Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1382). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 69 [week ending on Sunday 25 October] – The 10 Commandments of IP Dispute Resolution | Republic of Cyprus v OHIM on halloumi | Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz | Passing off at common law and statutory passing off | Coty v Stadtsparkasse, back to Germany | EU Trade Secrets Draft… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts communication to the public | EU Commission's misinformation about UPC | Dior v (Sirous) Dior | Lyricists and copyright | Banking… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
This question, posed in relation to the law of the Bahamas, was answered by the Privy Council in Gold Rock Limited v Nylund Hylton [2015] UKPC 17, about which guest blogger Kevin Winters tells all.Copyright cases for the CJEU: have your sayTwo more references, respectively from Germany and the Netherlands, are heading the CJEU’s desks. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany.Never too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
Suddenly, over at Twitter, my fellow Tweeters @Joachim65 (aka Joachim Kubler of Germany, blogging at Todesstrafe USA (use GoogleTranslate!)) [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:19 am
The plaintiff had his domicile in Bielefeld (Germany). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:11 pm
Last week, Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered an important Opinion in Coty Germany v Amazon, C-567/18 [not yet available in English]. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
However, several factors combine to tilt him away from taking this approach alone: these include (i) the sheer complexity of the mechanisms for operating the proposed system which will be as hard to amend and fine-tune as it has been to establish in the first place, (ii) its plainly divisive nature, (iii) the absurdly convoluted structure for litigating unitary patents and matters relating to them, (iv) the fact that the realities relating to the satisfactory governance of the European Patent Office… [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:35 am
Freedom of the pressLast year The IPKat reported on two new important referrals to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from Germany. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
Background VG Wort is the collecting society that has exclusive responsibility for representing authors and publishers of literary works in Germany. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:43 pm
He referred to Mann J’s judgment in Tillery Valley Foods v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 pm
’ The decision brings Australia back into line with other jurisdictions, including the US, the UK, Germany, the European Patent Office and Taiwan, where the naming of a machine as inventor has been found to be incompatible with patent laws. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Meanwhile, Nokia's infringement claims against Daimler are falling apart.The Sharp-Huawei license deal further validates the positions taken by the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office of Germany) in its interventions in multiple German Nokia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
"This ups the ante for Huawei before the Federal Circuit.In other Huawei v. [read post]
