Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 26,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 7:37 am
United States, No. 13-9972.I'll have more to say on this list later.Over at SCOTUSblog, all their "breaking news" blurb has to say about the list is that the Court took no action on the same-sex marriage cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Arizona v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 7:51 am
Having no other option, claimant filed for an appeal in the United States District Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in CNH Industrial N.V. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
Two years ago, in Honeycutt v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:36 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
Both are remands from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court to rethink its Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
V. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
Applying the intervening decision here, the district court granted 2255 relief. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:39 am
United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:26 am
In Geier v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:36 am
Arkansas Valley Adventures, January 6, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
(No. 08-586, March 30, 2010), the United States Supreme Court has vacated the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Harris Assocs. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 7:38 am
United States, 443 F.3d 956, 960 (8th Cir. 2006) (“[A] panel may depart from circuit precedent based on an intervening opinion of the Supreme Court that undermines the prior precedent. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 2:59 am
The post United States Supreme Court may address reasonableness of scope of seizure in Nevada v. [read post]
