Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 1621 - 1640 of 16,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2016, 9:25 am
As part of the Law Library’s ongoing commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 12:05 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 We are back, and hope you’ll tune in as co-hosts Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck discuss the latest in national security legal news, including: The questions associated with neutrality and co-belligerency (and especially “qualified neutrality”) in relation to US and allied support to Ukraine in the Ukraine-Russia War The Supreme Court’s decision to grant a stay in Lloyd Austin v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
 Twelve good men (and women) and true couldn't agree unanimously on whether she should be put to death on their direction or spared to spend the remainder of her life in prison with no hope of ever being released. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
To the extent that Mostyn J followed Nicholas in Kremen (formerly Agrest) v Agrest [2010] EWHC 3091 (Fam), [2011] 2 F.L.R. 490 and in Hope v Krejci [2012] EWHC 1780 (Fam) and treated company law principles as inapplicable in family cases, the court disagreed, so Kremen and Hope are doubted. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:38 pm by Sarah Berry
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:16 am by Patrick Goold
Today, Smokey hopes to exercise his termination rights under federal copyright law to reclaim ownership over the songs. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
The United States has done so much for Germany in the 20th century. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court called a special session and heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Case Commented On: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 (Can LII); 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII) Intimate partner violence (IPV) takes many forms, all of which cause harm to survivors (who are disproportionately women and children). [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
The IPKat hopes not, but the court didn't' expressly state that they refer to Art.5(2). [read post]