Search for: "Heard v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 17,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Since the officers failed to give proper notice of their “purpose” prior to entering the apartment, the AD1 thought the entry was unlawful, and that the New York County Supreme Court should have granted SJ’s motion to suppress the evidence retrieved and that the conviction thus needed to be reversed.That had to be suppressing.# # #DECISIONPeople v Jones [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Here is how Tymkovich (who, by the way, argued on behalf of the state of Colorado unsuccessfully in Romer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments on Wednesday in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Q: I heard something about Homeland Security giving states more time to issue Real ID-compliant licenses. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
State - A12A0274 is an appeal of a Johnson County, Wrightsville, Georgia Jury Trial verdict heard on May 2nd, 2012. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:30 am by Scott Bluni
Following an evidentiary hearing during which expert testimony was heard, the Court reversed its previous ruling to find all claims of the asserted patents invalid as a matter of law under §101. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case is from the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, and is styled, Ronald Mason v. [read post]