Search for: "Holme v. Holme" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2020, 11:25 am by JR Chaves
Proposición de Nino Bravo (sobre las víctimas): Un beso y una flor, un te quiero, una caricia y un adiós» IX. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am by Randy Barnett
In the end, (to paraphrase Justice Holmes’s infamous aphorism) 100 years of legal apartheid was enough! [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
(Incidentally, past recess appointments include both Oliver Wendell Holmes and William J. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:08 am
A blog with a difference, and one which the Kat would love to give more support to if only time permitted, is the Free Legal Web blog, which is part of a far wider vision of Nick Holmes. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
The Article then tests the descriptive and normative validity of this "New Institutional First Amendment," finding that it both explains and justifies much of the Court's recent school speech doctrine, including its recent ruling in Morse v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
" "A potent precedent favoring the constitutionally-questionable provisions of the United States Patriot Act passed shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the 1917 law was given the Supreme Court's approval in Schenk v United States, when Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, 'When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight....'… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm by Sandy Levinson
That's really a stupid slogan, since, as Holmes said, taxes are the price we pay for civilization (even if we recognize the possibility of taxes being excessive). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm by admin
Pfizer sought to reverse the First Circuit’s decision by arguing that the decision ran afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision Holmes v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board acknowledged the ruling in Imperial Holmes Corp v Lamont (1972) on the application of section 101 to architectural drawings. [read post]