Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 1621 - 1640 of 23,974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2020, 1:46 pm
You'd think the timing on this case might have given plaintiffs a fair amount of hope. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
")I seriously hope that someone famous takes up the hypothetical and runs for every single office in California in the next general election: every congressional seat, Governor, every statewide office, etc. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:38 pm
 At least when, as here, you then end your defense case by asking the court to "check outside for one witness in the hope he might be here" and, when he's not, saying "The defense rests." [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
 I'm hoping that the answer is "yes".If only to keep these things lively. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:06 pm
" We all could likely add additional cases that didn't result in opinions in the Court of Appeals.)At a minimum, we can all at least hope that the number of these cases diminishes in the future, right? [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm by Brian Huddleston
I think we could legitimately argue that the majority opinion in Bowers v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Did Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Scalia vote as they did in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am by Robbie Stern
Despite its ruling, Court of Appeal accepted the basic principle in R (L) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis  [2009] UKSC 3 (at [45] per Lord Hope) that neither imperative takes precedence over the other. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:59 am by Paul Rosenzweig
 But I do hope that CFIUS asks on our behalf. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:00 am
 According to a recent case, you're going to have to hope and pray that your opponent's lawyer trips up and misses a filing deadline.In Farkas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Miller Bernstein LLP In Lavender v. [read post]