Search for: "In Re: Jones v." Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Jones, No. 07-5994 In a prosecution for firearm possession by a felon, the District Court's order suppressing evidence is reversed, where the District Court, in assessing whether the officers who arrested Defendant had reasonable suspicion, erred by failing to take into account all information observed by the officers until Defendant yielded to unambiguous police authority. . [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:10 pm by Kevin
But if you’re willing to open your mind a little and consider, for example, some videos you might see circulating on TikTok and Facebook, then you might end up agreeing with proven truth-hound Alex Jones that there just might be something to all this. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm by David Lat
Their ability to make mistakes suggests that they’re mere mortals.Supreme Court justices: they’re just like us! [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 am by Adam Gillette
   Unmentioned in the observation is the ironic point that the First Amendment protection against abstract advocacy of violence comes from Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am by Justin P. Webb
Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012) could one say that this was a trespass?) [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
For example, Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is in the final stages of completing the new $1.1 billion Cowboys stadium. [5] With a standard 80,000 seats that can be expanded to 100,000, and an additional 300 suites, the revenue from ticket prices will only be the beginning for Jones. [6] The most expensive seats in the new stadium are expected to go for approximately $340 a game. [7] Naming rights for the new stadium will likely yield an unprecedented amount, and various… [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 3 May 2018 Sir James Munby P gave directions in the case of Re Venables [2018] EWHC 1037 (Fam) (see above). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2024 judgment on meaning was handed down by HHJ Lewis in Unity Plus Healthcare Ltd v Clay & Ors (Re Preliminary Issues) [2024] EWHC 1278 (KB). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by Eugene Volokh
No qualified immunity, the court said: In Jones v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
If you’re wondering how I’m able to make that mildly impressive prediction, take a moment to look over the docket and consider how many suits will be present if just the authors of the 10 amicus briefs show up for argument. [read post]