Search for: "In Re The Dependency Of D. R."
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2013, 9:01 am
D. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
More than half of the anticipated collections appears to be owed by one individual taxpayer: Michael D. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:54 am
This is not legal aid work when you’re working for the court, and there’s no reason that only defence lawyers have to work at legal aid rates. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:01 am
[Now at FAQ D.10] D.9. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 7:41 am
And, in fact, we do “facilitate” destructive choices, when they’re by women. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 3:00 pm
Hollywood Reporter: We’d like to first give a general overview of the state of entertainment and IP law in China. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:44 pm
Without Apple, there’d be a lot LESS electronic distribution than there is now. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm
This post includes the abstracts of the papers presented at that conference.The Conference started with an inaugural address from D. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
If you’re short on time, start with these posts. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
The number could grow even higher depending on the initial reaction to the tax. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:12 pm
The rings can be worth much more depending on the owner and the circumstances. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Outterson recommended a re-evaluation of the possible use of direct government funding to deal with the issue, and suggested charging generic manufacturers with a fee payable to the company who did all the R&D, including the clinical trials and regulatory approval phases. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:29 am
They look alike, they’re in the same place, and once they’re filleted, nobody can tell the difference. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:50 am
The NPR story backs up my point: “If people had to depend on Medicaid, they’d have to spend all their assets, basically go broke to qualify, and then taxpayers pick up the bill. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:12 am
Section 522(d)(11)(C) creates an exemption in the proceeds of a policy of life insurance 1) if the debtor was dependent on the decedent at the time of death, 2) to the extent necessary for the debtor’s support and the support of the debtor’s dependents. [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:23 am
That may or may not be available from a public provider, depending on your state. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am
This result defies common sense and the rule of law — I’d imagine quite a few people would disagree with Megaupload’s argument that corporations deserve a free pass from obeying the law. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:17 am
Requirement not to deceive is founded in duty to take care w/r/t each other’s beliefs. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am
In re S.E.O., 873 F.Supp.2d 536, 546 (S.D.N.Y.2012). [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:00 pm
Well, that depends on you. [read post]
