Search for: "In re April B." Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
  Also named: Donald Trump, Mike Tyson, Shawn Combs (d/b/a Puff Daddy, d/b/a P. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:15 pm by Gene Quinn
The fact that the outsourcing of patent searches and the preparation of patent applications violates U.S. law only makes perfect sense, particularly when you factor into consideration the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 181 (re: national security) and 35 U.S.C. 184 (re: foreign filing licenses). [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:09 pm by Guru Immigration
For example, many B-1/B-2 tourist visas have a 10-year expiration printed on them. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:09 pm by Guru Immigration
For example, many B-1/B-2 tourist visas have a 10-year expiration printed on them. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  (At this point, the question may be what case in the pipeline is so plainly devoid of vehicle problems that the Court skips what we’re guessing is a relist to run a final quality check.) [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Third, the April 2016 press release was outside California’s three-year statute of limitations for fraud, which the Ninth Circuit borrows for §43(a)(1)(B) claims. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:58 pm by John Jascob
Finally, the court noted that claims under Section 10(b) must give rise to a strong inference of scienter. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:43 am by Laura H. Juillet
This arrangement continued until April 2011 when, following a re-tender of the services, the Council appointed a new contractor, Lorne Stewart plc (“LS”) to replace Carillion. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:11 am by Jon Hyman
 — via Employment Essentials Social Media & Workplace Technology Curt Schilling, ESPN, Free Speech and quirky state laws — via Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space Collision of Expert Witnesses, Social Media — via FRAUDfiles “Ashley Madison plaintiffs cannot sue anonymously over hack, judge says” — via How Appealing Hunting of the ‘Like’: Beware the concerted activity Boojums —… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:29 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Reimbursement of the appeal fee (R. 103(2)(a) EPC)Partial refund of the appeal fee was requested under R. 103(2)(a) EPC.R. 103(2)(a) EPC specifies that "The appeal fee shall be reimbursed at 50% if the appeal is withdrawn after expiry of the period under paragraph 1(b), provided withdrawal occurs:(a) if a date for oral proceedings has been set, at least four weeks before that date".By submissions of 20 April 2017, the Board was informed of the appellant's intention… [read post]