Search for: "Jack Doe 2" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations Adversary Case Assessment: Putting Your ESI To Good Use – http://t.co/1ttS7Dh (Jim Shook) Bit-By-Bit: A Reality Check - http://t.co/Ce2Mokj (Tim Leehealey) Costs of Electronic Discovery Growing - http://t.co/qhqtTId (Gina Passarella) Court Sides with College Accused of Snooping on Student’s Email – http://tinyurl.com/43ugxwo (Evan Brown) Destruction of Electronic Evidence, Misconduct Lead to $1 Million Fine,… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Larry Tribe Guest
Nor does it follow that Congress could compel everyone to purchase liability insurance. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:42 pm by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Here is how I understand Jack’s response: Yes, Wilson does not seem to have actually referred to Resolution VI. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am by JB
" [2 Farrand at 14, 16-17] You can see that Resolution VI, although it does not speak the modern language of economics, is also concerned with interstate spillovers and potential collective action problems. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
I argue that the evidence does not support these historical claims.In his last post, Neil Siegel focuses on some of my arguments and concludes that they are either unpersuasive or relatively unimportant. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:46 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
  In other words, in the recorded version of Wilson’s speech that Jack Balkin examines in his Commerce article in the Michigan Law Review and that Prof. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:50 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Whatever it is, it is not Resolution VI and Wilson does not claim that it is.Scholars have simply assumed Wilson was referring to Resolution VI, even as they noticed that Wilson’s principle seemed somewhat different than Resolution VI (as does Jack Balkin, for example). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  Even the leading academic supporters of Obamacare’s constitutionality, such as Yale law professors Akhil Amar and Jack Balkin, use the term, as did Time magazine’s managing editor Richard Stengel in his recent cover story about the Constitution. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:21 am by Alexander Tsesis
Redemption of founding principles, as I read Jack Balkin’s book, Constitutional Redemption, is not nostalgic naivete for some supposed heroic period of American history. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
Because it was difficult to locate a telephone jack, the mobile computer user was often unable to receive electronic mail. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
What difference does it make if 2% or 20% of chubs are contaminated with non-O157 STECS? [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
…and don’t forget our recent posts: Religious freedom does not stop at the prison gates – Part 2 July 21, 2011 Rosalind English The book that all family practitioners wish they had written July 21, 2011 1 Crown Office Row Ratcliffe climate change protesters acquitted on appeal July 20, 2011 David Hart QC Terrorism off the agenda, for now July 20, 2011 Adam Wagner A leap of faith? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:48 pm by lawmrh
Indeed, in a survey cited by Tarr concerning state supreme court justices up for retention from 1964 to 2000, less than 2% were defeated. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:00 am by Tun-Jen Chiang
So what began as a reductio ad absurdum on my part is now a still-a-joke-but-not-nearly-as-much option that Jack Balkin is exploring. [read post]