Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
Here is a case worth reading: Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
” 5 James W. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
See See v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
A federal judge ordered his release in March 2010, but the United States government has fought that order. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
In the case of Selma, these included paraphrasing some of King’s speeches. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
For a similar case, see United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
As Wikipedia explains, “impeaching” a witness “in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual who is testifying in a trial. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:43 am
Michelle V. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
And, with all this talk of authorizations to use military force, Cody Poplin shared the text of the documents from the last time the United States declared a state of war following the attacks on Pearl Harbor in this week’s Throwback Thursday. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
Henley’s name in a transformative nature invoking the protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution” and that “the advertisement is obviously a joke. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:35 am
United States and last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:14 pm
As the oldest federal court in the United States, it pre-dates by several weeks the organization of the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
