Search for: "John Doe, 4" Results 1621 - 1640 of 8,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 2:24 am
On appeal, Applicant convinced the Board of one of the following arguments: (1) that the marks are distinguishable, (2) that consumers of the products are highly sophisticated, (3) that the registered mark is weak, (4) that the registered mark does not currently appear to be used in commerce, or (5) that the USPTO has allowed similar pairs of marks to co-exist on the Principal Register. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The Commission filed a complaint in August 2019 alleging that two convicted felons, John F. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:24 am
  Today the Big 4 wireless carriers insist on a definition of “unlimited” that does not match the usual expectation. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:24 am
  Today the Big 4 wireless carriers insist on a definition of “unlimited” that does not match the usual expectation. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
Mattis on the government’s proposed transfer of John Doe. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:25 am
Harder to guess than in a Section 2(d) case, without knowing the evidence.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:42 am by Jon Hyman
What does Elmo have in common with a former four-star general? [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
Applicant contended that Opposer abandoned the CINGULAR marks when it stopped using them after “making the switch” to AT&T; that Opposer’s CINGULAR registrations have expired; that New Cingular does business as AT&T Mobility and does not use its legal name (New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC) except on formal legal documents; and that “[c]ustomer-facing interactions are under the name AT&T Mobility. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
  How does FSIS respond to the same issues? [read post]