Search for: "Johnson v. United States Government" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Therefore, any government regulation of the license plates was required to be viewpoint-neutral. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Mozilla stated that all adverts across the internet would change to be tailored to the profile chosen. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, they told the justices, the real problem is that many cities in the western United States simply didn’t want to spend the money to provide housing and services for homeless people. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It was widely used in the United States until it was banned for public use by EPA in 1987. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Johnson), whereas a law that forbids people from destroying their draft cards for (what the Court somewhat disingenuously accepted as) administrative purposes does not violate the First Amendment, even if the particular draft card burner intends to express a message by burning the draft card (as the Court held in United States v. [read post]
 After being denied more information about the valuation, plaintiffs sued, alleging that the units were worth at least $60.00 per unit. [read post]