Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,826
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Richard Hasen suggests that by answering “no, with no explanation,” to “Pennsylvania Republicans’ calls to put on hold the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s order redrawing the state’s congressional district lines to cure a partisan gerrymander,” “the Court dodged a question it has refused to wade into since the disputed 2000 presidential election culminating in the… [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:52 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiraltySelection of England as Forum Did Not Divest Court Of Jurisdiction to Enter, Enforce Attachment Order Consub Delaware LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
February 4, 2009): Several other Courts in this District have since held the same. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am by Matthew Gilpin
The FTC has filed these motions in an attempt to convince the district courts to take an expansive interpretation of the Third Circuit’s K-Dur ruling.1. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, the Government affirmatively argued in the district court that Chevron deference is unwarranted. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:17 am by David Oscar Markus
In November, it will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
NetChoice and CCIA filed lawsuits against portions of both laws, and federal district courts in both Florida and Texas granted injunctions. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm by Michael Erdman
” Chief District Judge Jones dissented from this part of the ruling, opining that plaintiff’s allegations were adequate. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
The district court dismissed both, King appealed only the Bivens action, and the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
There, the district court found that (1) the ACLU had standing to challenge TSP; (2) the Fourth Amendment "requires prior warrants for any reasonable search," 438 F. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
In the absence of United States Ninth Circuit or Supreme Court guidance on the question, the court relied on unpublished decisions from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.  [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Gregory Dell
Long Term Disability Plan in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. [read post]