Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 35,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Carolyn Colvin, No. 14-3163 (7th Cir. 2015), July 31, 2015, United States Court of Appeal for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Hanson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 9:32 am
In addition to complaining that the Court's opinion ignored the Act's text, Judge Thapar opined about instances in which a defendant might not want to request a dismissal under the Act, noting that, with a dismissal without prejudice, the Government would simply obtain another indictment. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:25 am
No different conclusion obtains from United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
The Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:24 pm
03/10/2020 Judge Rosemary M. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm
He writes: The United States Patent and Trademark Office is ordered to expedite the reexamination of U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
" United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:22 am
United States, 06-6330 (per Booker, crack guidelines are advisory only; judge may consider crack/powder disparity in sentencing below the guidelines).United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:09 am
The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a fair and impartial trial. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
That appears to be the opinion of Magistrate Judge David Noce in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
That appears to be the opinion of Magistrate Judge David Noce in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:51 am
CAAF issued a unanimous opinion by Judge Stucky today in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
United States Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, as if predicting the very contents of my April 21, 2010 Daily Journal article, ordered Defendants AT & T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS LCC, and New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. to produce the contact information for thousands of customers that had complained after incurring international roaming charges without first issuing a privacy notice. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:21 am
[The Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
Labor unions poured money into the state to recall Mr. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
