Search for: "Kelly v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm by Mac Kelly
By Mac Kelly On Aug. 7, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in Kyser v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
Chambers of Riske, Salisbury & Kelly, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Léveillé, [1933] S.C.R. 456 (S.C.C.), the Court considered the role circumstantial evidence plays in meeting the burden of proof and stated at para. 35: The general principle in accordance with which in cases like the present the sufficiency of the evidence is to be determined was stated by Lord Chancellor Loreburn in Richard Evans & Co., Limited v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
Chambers of Riske, Salisbury & Kelly, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Carlos A. Kelly
In 2006, the Florida Legislature enacted several statutes in response to the United States Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
 Noriega said that the game portrayed him as a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state, and that it had damaged his reputation. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]