Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 3,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2016, 2:54 pm
United States and Overton v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:00 am
United States, the Court unanimously affirmed that a tipper’s gift of inside information can satisfy the “personal benefit” requirement of Dirks v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:44 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
United States [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
United States [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
He was an important scholar, and he had interesting thoughts on how to understand Citizens United from the perspective of corporate law. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
This sort of agreement can go a long way towards preventing potential or future manufacturers from stealing your design. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:51 am
Recall that the Obama Administration refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:03 pm
Amant v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
President Grover Cleveland used the United States Army to break the strike. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
Here in the United States, Uber has been mired in a class action in the Northern District of California, among other litigation. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
It allows lawsuits against foreign governments to go forward in the United States when “rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue” and there is a commercial connection to the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
Nevertheless this broad statement must be read down in line with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court and larger benches of the Bombay High Court on those grounds.The Supreme Court has held (in JK Aggarwal (1991 (2) SCC 283), Para 4 onwards):“It would appear that in the inquiry, the Respondent-Corporation was represented by its Personnel and Administration Manager who is stated to be a man of law. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
Nevertheless this broad statement must be read down in line with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court and larger benches of the Bombay High Court on those grounds.The Supreme Court has held (in JK Aggarwal (1991 (2) SCC 283), Para 4 onwards):“It would appear that in the inquiry, the Respondent-Corporation was represented by its Personnel and Administration Manager who is stated to be a man of law. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that supplying a single, commodity component of a multi-component invention from the United States is an infringing act under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
