Search for: "MARY DOES" Results 1621 - 1640 of 7,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
S. 96 (1944), the Court stated that “the exercise of due diligence does not relieve the owner of his obligation” to provide a seaworthy ship and, in the same ruling, held that the fellow-servant doctrine did not provide a defense. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 7:26 am by Gordon Ahl
Mary McCord discussed how armed militia groups in the U.S. have embraced Trump’s tweet this week that warned of civil war. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:14 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
Embassy following the removal of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, who Giuliani had accused of facilitating Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:47 pm by Michel Paradis
When the Framers wrote impeachment into the Constitution, they were drawing on a long history of English common law. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:23 am by Gordon Ahl
Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:31 am by Margaret Taylor
The call memo of the conversation between Trump and Zelensky does not mention Volker, but the whistleblower complaint does. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:45 am by David Post
To what elements of that composition does his copyright extend? [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:29 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Act does provide far broader protections to journalists from warrants, wiretaps, or production orders under s. 488.02(5) of the Criminal Code. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Doe v Dowling [2019] NSWSC 1222 Fagan J entered judgment for four anonymised plaintiffs in the sum of $150,000 each in respect of defamatory internet publications making sensational and salacious allegations of a sexual nature. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“Ghost Work” by Mary Gray—platform organization makes it harder for workers to organize, and that’s part of the point. [read post]
The complaint is framed in the language of the whistleblower statute: The writer states that he believes that the president’s actions “constitute ‘a serious or flagrant problem, abuse, or violation of law or Executive order’ that ‘does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters,’ consistent with the definition of an ‘urgent concern’ in” the statute. [read post]