Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 18,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 6:56 pm
Michael Atkins has meticulously covered adidas’ 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 stripe trademark victory against Payless Shoes here. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
Data from the Epidemiological Surveillance Network in Madrid covering January 2020 to late June 2020, which overlaps with the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, shows that compared with the first half of 2019, there was a marked decline in reports of foodborne infections. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
ZT's third-party registration evidence, purportedly showing the weakness of the word "zoom," was ineffective since there was no evidence regarding extent of use of those marks and since most of the registrations covered unrelated goods and services.As to the marks, ZT pointed to the testimony that many of PayPal's customers do not speak English and may not pronounce "xoom" as "zoom. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
See, e.g., In re Caserta, 46 USPQ2d 1088, 1090-91 (TTAB 1998) (holding FURR-BALL FURCANIA, used as the principal character in a single children’s book, does not function as a mark even though the character’s name appeared on the cover and every page of the story). [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:23 am
The claimant's registration was wide enough to cover the defendant's activities, or many of them - including merchandising and concerts. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:37 am
Opposer submitted 37 third-party registrations for marks covering both restaurant services and wine, as well as six registrations showing that well-known individuals have registered their names for alcoholic beverages and restaurant services. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:05 am
Emerging from the busyness of hearing preparation, this Kat has now found a moment to tell you about a clever little loophole just closed by OHIM (the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market) which previously made it possible to defeat (in part at least) an attempt to revoke a Community trade mark (CTM) despite it never having been used.For those who don't get the tenuous reference in the title, scroll downUnder European trade mark law, you either use it or you lose it… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
A summary of the topics covered as provided by LexisNexis follows: On this edition of LexisNexis Corporate and Commercial Insights, Francis G.X. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:19 pm
Farrell also saw marked decreases in cases involving admissions and curriculum advising. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
Affirming a Section 2(d) refusal, the Board found Applicant's mark AMMIRAGLIA for "wines, sparkling wines, liqueurs," likely to cause confusion with the registered mark FLAGSHIP for vodka. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:13 am
"Because the design of a black horse in registrant's mark is a pictorial representation of the wording in both marks, such design further reinforces the similarities between them. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
No Fault benefits will cover their medical expenses, lost wages, attendant care, replacement services, and other benefits related to injuries suffered in the accident. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
The issue flows from OHIM's (now obsolete) Communication No. 4/03 which stated that Community trade mark applications which adopted the Nice class heading would be regarded by OHIM as covering all of the goods and services in the designated class. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
Today marks the fifth anniversary of my firm, the Smith Law Group. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:52 am
It's only a small milestone, but the IPKat is happy to mark it. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
Today marks the fifth anniversary of my firm, the Smith Law Group. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:47 am
But at the very least, “in connection with” shouldn’t cover “broad swaths” of noncommercial speech. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:47 am
Saucy Fish illustrates that when you plan ahead and file for the right registrations – including for marks covering the design of your packaging – then you can get real results in court. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:39 am
s mark consisted exclusively of signs or indications which may designate characteristics of the goods, consisted of signs or indications that have become customary in the trade, was of such a nature as to deceive, was such that its use was prohibited by enactment or rule of law, was based on an application for registration that was made in bad faith, caused a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, and likelihood of association with the opponent’s trade marks… [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:22 am
Trade mark holders: beware! [read post]
