Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 19,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
The ruling, G.G. v Gloucester County Sch. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court yesterday denied review in Ricks v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:00 pm
The ruling, G.G. v Gloucester County Sch. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
(Mark Tushnet has a post raising similar questions.) [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Singer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
But Doe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
Earlier today, Mark Tushnet posted about Justice Thomas’s recent eye-opening concurrence in the Court’s denial of cert. in McKee v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:32 am
Look Cycle International v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
Lyle reported on the decisions in Fisher and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:17 pm
¶40 (quoting Bingham School v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
In De Grandpré Chait v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Case citation: Rupp v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern observes that Dimaya “marked the first time Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg assigned a majority opinion in her nearly 25 years on the high court. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am
In 1993, in the case of Amaratunge v Sirimal, Justice Mark Fernando of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court made a remark that remains relevant. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm
They mark the seriousness of the defamation and are a part of the vindication. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
Article 7(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks in its original version provided:‘The trade mark shall not entitle the proprietor to prohibit its use in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the Community under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent. [read post]
