Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 8:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Responding to the Justices’ request for the federal government’s views, Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:48 am by Cody Poplin
” In Defense One, Kevin Baron argues that for all his strategy, Obama better have a plan B. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:11 pm
Thomas Johnson & David Pinsky, Representing Claimant: Pre-Arbitration Considerations Jeremy K. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Luna; Nathan Montgomery; Adam Daskivich; David Murtha; St. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:55 am by Dan Filler
 In his view, it isn't the school's (fairly extensive) mandatory upper level course requirement that matters; it's that at-risk students never let down their effort. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
The PPACA authorizes such tax credits for exchanges “established by the State,” and (unlike other health care reform proposals that did not pass) nowhere authorizes such credits for federal exchanges (or, for that matter, private for-profit exchanges). [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The trial court ruled against Susan in both matters. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
”[2]However, as a matter of law in the United States and Bangladesh, Apparel Mart and the Bangladeshi companies are each viewed as separate legel entities, each wholly responsible for its own activities. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:18 pm by Robert B. Milligan
With respect the seizure order language, in order to obtain an ex parte order, the plaintiff must show, that (1) a temporary restraining order under Rule 65(b) would be inadequate because the defendant would evade, avoid, or otherwise not comply with such order; (2) an immediate and irreparable injury will occur if seizure is not ordered; (3) the harm to the plaintiff of denying the order outweighs the legitimate interests of defendant and substantially outweighs any harm to third parties;… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
Under Indonesian law, the matter is less clear. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
1st Breakout Session: Trademark TheoryHarms, Benefits, and Justifications in Trademark LawStacey Dogan© and patent are often considered to be about incentives (getting benefits), but TM law in the general view is about preventing harm/misinformation, at least in theory; misinformation can harm both producers and consumers. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm by Elim
Courtney et al. 2014 Link Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patents, Trade-marks Vaver, David 1997 Link Intellectual Property Law, Second Edition Vaver, David 2011 Link International and Transnational Criminal Law, Second Edition Currie, Robert J. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
 It is a matter of great happiness to the IPKat and Merpel that these posts have been so well received. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 5:07 pm by Ginzburg & Bronshteyn LLP
The Court has had a commissioner post open since David Cowan, who hears Probate Matters in Department 9 of the Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District, was recently appointed as a judge. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:08 am
I tend not to be a big fan, generally, of resolving through private litigation matters that are more properly viewed as substantial international disputes between nation-states. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:00 am by Robichaud
 It matters not what “happened” outside the cave, it matters what can be “proven” or undermined within it. [read post]