Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1621 - 1640
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2020, 3:26 am
Applicant made one sole argument: “[T]he word ‘folded’ means ‘drunk’ which adds an alternative congruous [sic] meaning to the mark – that of a drunk slice of pizza. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:32 am
The parties were taken to court for the contravention of section 92 of the Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
Section 2(a), in relevant part, prohibits registration of “matter which may . . . falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs or national symbols . . . . [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:36 am
If you haven't already registered (it's free), click here for all you need to know. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:14 am
Professor Mark Lemley suggested the potential that a 101 eligibility issues are essentially threshold jurisdictional questions – rather than Section 282 defenses. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 5:36 pm
" The suit, which relies heavily on documents provided to the rights group by former AT&T employee Mark Klein, alleges that AT&T helped the government spy on internet communications, data-mine domestic call records and listen in on phone calls without a warrant as required by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:05 pm
Little did they (or anyone) know that Florida attorney Mark O’Mara could upset the tidy apple barrel? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:22 am
Mark-ups are old-school (i.e., a red pen is used to mark-up a paper copy). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:49 pm
Seriously, the immature behavior at work described in the Matter of Sindoni v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
And no matter how you slice it, they are all in dire need of government regulation. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
This week's group offers a strong blend of blogs from firms large and small, with each publication touching on a different subject matter. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:55 pm
The full Court has set the matter for an en banc hearing on the specific question: Does the bar on registration of disparaging marks in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
If a defendant isn’t using a mark to identify the source of its goods, trademark law doesn’t apply. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
Both men received high marks from their superiors. 4. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:45 pm
Mark your calendars politicos! [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:49 pm
Beckloff recently removed the three co-Trustees of Herbalife founder Mark R. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
Most of the proposals won't matter to most law schools, which already do most of the things that would be required: having and publishing a non-discrimination statement; working to broaden access to the legal profession; requiring anti-bias training; and so on. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:07 am
When I assist clients in setting up entities, one of the threshold matters, of course, is the selection of a name for the entity. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:59 pm
Mark Lutz, the CEO of Ingenuity 13, was not allowed to testify. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
What constitutes a public purpose is defined broadly and "encompasses any use which contributes to the health, safety, general welfare, convenience or prosperity of the community" (Matter of 225 Front St., Ltd. v City of Binghamton, 61 AD3d 1155, 1157 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Johnson v Town of Caroga, 162 AD3d 1353, 1355 [3d Dept 2018]; see Matter of Court St. [read post]
