Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 22,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 7:57 am
The purpose of the 3-2 commission is largely to allow an administration to pursue its regulatory goals, a generalized purpose that courts have tended to uphold when a new administration seeks to repeal the rules adopted by a prior administration’s agency leadership.Under the SEC Stabilization Act, Commissioners would have six-year terms instead of five-year terms, and they would be selected two-at-a-time in a staggard manner so that two seats would open every two years. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 7:54 am
After the County’s first attempt at adopting a streamlining ordinance in 2015, California’s Fifth Appellate District ruled that the County had violated CEQA by adopting an inadequate EIR. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:34 am
Controlling the narrative mattered enormously. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
There have been a few district court rulings that touched very briefly on the first of these questions. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:44 pm
New families may include biological parents, biological children, adopted children, step-siblings, and half-siblings. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Our Investment Adviser Group assists financial service providers with complex issues that arise in the course of their business, including complying with federal and state laws and rules. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
As a specific matter, the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs’ ATS claims may move forward against the corporate defendant Cisco, and one plaintiff’s claims under the TVPA against individual Cisco executives, reversing the district court. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:47 am
It doesn't matter if the defendant has standing. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
Subsequently, the City adopted ordinances to tax and establish a licensure framework for commercial cannabis uses in 2018 and 2019. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
Circuit court already twice rejected and will likely refuse to adopt once more. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In a unanimous decision written by Justice Gorsuch, the Supreme Court adopted the Perez family’s interpretation. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Through bylaw amendments, of course (emphasis ours): To reflect [Sec. 14a-8] philosophy and intent, a company should have the right to adopt, in its governing documents, requirements[61] for shareholder proposals that differ from those set forth in rule 14a-8. fn 61: … Both courts and the [SEC] have stated that the right to present a proposal is a matter of state law. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:05 pm
Justice Trower’s rulings in this case, like the rulings of Vice Chancellor Will in the Disney case I discussed in a blog post earlier this week, both revealed a fundamental judicial reluctance for courts to pass judgments on board decisions on how to operate the company that were made in good faith. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:36 am
So when we suggest that SessionGuardian could be used on sensitive matters remotely, we were told no. sensitive matters could only be worked on premise in a supervised document review setting. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
” The City ultimately adopted the CPU and certified the PEIR in 2018; the final CPU stated: “[The] Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone limits the height of new buildings to protect coastal views. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
No matter what a court does, they will end the case exactly where they started. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
The appeal focused on the district court’s failure to delegate to an arbitrator the initial question of arbitrability.Coinbase’s interlocutory appeal is authorized by Section 16(a) of the FAA, adopted by Congress in 1988. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”Previewing the attitude that would be on display in the Clark case, Doug Evans called the Flowers case “a ridiculous ruling. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
When and how does the business judgment rule apply to any board decisions on these matters? [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
Whether we choose to refer to that as “Holy Matrimony” or simply as “marriage according to the law, rights and ceremonies of the Church of England” really does not matter. [read post]
