Search for: "Palmes v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Peter W. Martin
On April 25, 2013, the Illinois Supreme Court decided Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass’n, 2013 IL 110505. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
(Thursday night I ducked out of the reception early, to catch the Padres v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm by Chuck Cosson
Implied, but insufficiently stated in the article, is the fact that the “mindfulness technology” was invented by humans, in order to address a perceived market for tools to help resist distractions. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) Section 230 immunity: Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
I was discussing the specifics of Florida state law — not what federal law (or, for that matter, any other state’s law) requires or permits. [read post]