Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
(for the Court) stated at  17: Having regard to the terminology adopted by Madam Justice McLachlin in  Young v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:20 am by admin
” (para. 11) ICESCR Nor has the United States ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976, 993 UNTS 3 , despite signing in 1977. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Robert Chesney
As Ben says, there is a lot to talk about with respect to al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am by Karwan Eskerie
” (para 99) Comment It would take a brave person indeed to envy the Court its task in a case such as this. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:45 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the Court of Justice’s (CJEU) landmark judgment in Pepsico v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (C-281/10P). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am by Darius Whelan
 In 2012, I blogged about the important decision of Hussein v The Labour Court [2012] IEHC 364. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Corcoran and Pritchard v Van Nes. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm by admin
  As Cumming J. aptly stated, when faced with similar circumstances in North York Branson Hospital v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:04 pm
Drury v the Secretary of State[2004] 1 WLR 1906 set out the criterion for prospective possession orders where further acts of trespass are threatened. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 12:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Health (paras 102-103) and Fraser (para 41) explicitly stated that no legislative dispute mechanism was required by s. 2(d). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]