Search for: "People v Catchings"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Merely speeding down the street, even in tandem with another vehicle, does not constitute a "speed contest" within the meaning of that statute (see People v Grund, 14 NY2d 32; see also Shea v Kelly, 121 AD2d 620, 621). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:42 pm
In the case of Van Horn v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:37 am
Perhaps they feel as if they have some catching up to do? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
The problem is that the post-trial systems are terrible at catching and fixing those mistakes. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:46 pm
Here is the catch, though. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
The process of “incorporating” national rights into the Fourteenth Amendment was fairly slow to catch on. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
Careful with the comments on that last link, please — abjectly stupid might be catching. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
I haven't had a chance to review it carefully, but several people have emailed me this new opinion, citing it as something of a post-Tobacco watershed: Morgan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:02 pm
— Boring v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
The application of the drug or combination of drugs shall be continued until the person is dead.But there's a catch. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
In Elie v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
Did you catch all of that? [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 12:00 pm
With Web 2.0 technologies, more people have more opportunities to post information about themselves and others online, often with scant regard for individual privacy. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:40 pm
State of Kansas v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:02 pm
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
Last week, the California Supreme Court decided a big workplace privacy case, Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:08 pm
Oftentimes, the goal seems to be to catch and punish as many people as possible or to pass sweeping bans, but not necessarily to do justice. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
Alas, the decision in People v. [read post]
