Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am
Lord Fraser’s 1983 description of the conditions for the concep [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
See you in the House of Lords! [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
That way we could praise the Lord and pass the ammunition in cases where our clients weren't (yet) directly involved.And so we arrive at the catalyst for this post, DeNeui v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
The starting-point for this little essay is a dictum of Lord Justice Jacob (noted by the IPKat here) in European Central Bank v DSS [2008] EWCA Civ 192 to this effect: "[This litigation] illustrates yet again the need for a one-stop patent shop (with a ground floor department for first instance and a first floor department for second instance) for those who have Europe-wide businesses. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 6:18 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Lord Lucas proposes new UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 section to provide remedy for groundless copyright threats (1709 Copyright Blog) (Techdirt) US CAFC scraps point of novelty for design patents: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Inventive Step) … [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
' Is the principle of state sovereignty challenged not only by a single people, but also by international organizations? [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:40 am
The Court found it simpler to reach that conclusion because of a 1983 House of Lords decision, Mandla v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm
" Just 46 people were questioned-eight more than the minimum necessary-and only for a few minutes each. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
If you want to know how the House of Lords debate over the UK's Digital Economy Bill kicked off, Hugo Cox has given it an appropriately reverential treatment on the 1709 Blog here. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
The Nuremberg International Military Tribunal addressed the issue of pre-emptive strikes in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:42 am
The team lined up for this purpose is Lord Neuberger MR, Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Sullivan. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
The "E-meter" itself is said to cost anywhere from $900 for the Mark V up to $4,650 for the "Mark VII Super Quantum E-meter," which is apparently similar to the Mark V but with super quantum abilities. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
The people from this small town of 9,600, went to the games and held up signs with passages from the Bible. [read post]
