Search for: "People v Paine" Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Administrator
Labour Pains 3. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:57 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in Pennsylvania found simply speculative their claims that had they been told that working at home on intermittent leave was an option, instead of taking continuous FMLA leave where they could not work at all, they would have been able to provide medical certification of their need to work from home (McBride v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Or, in the words of John Marshall (with whom I sometimes do agree) in McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:46 am by Michael B. Stack
A clerical worker with a college degree would have far less of a loss of earning for an intermittent painful bad back than an unskilled assembly line worker. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am by Guest Blogger
  Pear’s piece has provoked an ongoing avalanche of fervid reactions from both friends and foes of the King v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
They may seem large compared with comparable awards for pain and suffering in personal injury cases. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, a supporting deposition from the child, in the form of a stenographically recorded voir dire establishing his competence to testify and verifying that he suffered substantial pain as a result of the defendant's actions is necessary to corroborate this allegation (see People v Claxton, 160 Misc 2d 550, 553-554 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1994]; see also People v Soler, 144 Misc 2d 524, 527-529 [Crim Ct, NY County 1989]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Thus, a supporting deposition from the child, in the form of a stenographically recorded voir dire establishing his competence to testify and verifying that he suffered substantial pain as a result of the defendant's actions is necessary to corroborate this allegation (see People v Claxton, 160 Misc 2d 550, 553-554 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1994]; see also People v Soler, 144 Misc 2d 524, 527-529 [Crim Ct, NY County 1989]). [read post]