Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 1621 - 1640 of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Rebekah
A Michigan carjacker explained his car theft spree as an attempt to “escape from flesh-eating bats and vampires” (People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
In May, a Maine federal district court a Maine federal district court rejected a church's First Amendment challenge to Maine Governor Janet Mills' COVID-19 order which at that time prohibited religious gatherings of more than ten people. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 6:13 pm
Kanter, Do Human Rights Treaties Matter: The Case for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities Alexandra V. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision on May 22, 2023 in People ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision on May 22, 2023 in People ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision on May 22, 2023 in People ex rel. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 9:40 pm by Tyson Snow
In that lengthy post, I described the procedural history of People v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision on May 22, 2023 in People ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 pm
The California Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision on May 22, 2023 in People ex rel. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Montana [official website] on Friday ruled [decision, PDF] that its state's November ballots may include Initiative 166 [text, PDF], a nonbinding policy statement that would direct the state's congress to support an amendment to the US Constitution [text] asserting that corporations are not people and money does not qualify as speech. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  While abstaining sometimes may be a prudent decision, the Chancery Court’s recent decision in Lockton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:42 am by Julie Lam
On June 1, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order amending its May 25, 2010 order in People v Tate, No. [read post]