Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
  On the whole, these are well-considered, well-written opinions that apply the language of the statute and the precedents of higher courts, easily within the limits in which reasonable people may differ. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
  Pennsylvania is saddled with a very pro-plaintiff Superior (intermediate appellate) Court, and in the ReglanTrilogy, that court  ignored what even it called a “tsunami” of contrary precedent to hold practically all (except for pre-2007 warning claims) the generic drug-related claims before it were not preempted. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:36 am
--> This post examines an opinion the Superior Court ofConnecticut recently issued in a civil case:  Dzamko v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
 Kenneth Vercammen & Associates Law Office helps people injured due to the negligence of others. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:59 am
Superior Court (International Rectifier Corp.), B239042 Escobar-Noble v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:20 am by Jon Gelman
In a case that took six weeks to try after 13 years of litigation, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg also will measure the credibility of expert witnesses and their theories in The People of California v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
On the rare occasions that the UK courts have disagreed with ECtHR case law, the Strasbourg Court has shown itself willing to engage in ‘judicial dialogue’ with the superior courts of the UK. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:37 am by Kathleen Krafft Miller
Pritchard, the Pennsylvania Superior Court went so far as to equate a dog to a table or lamp. [read post]