Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 45,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
In 2003, the Supreme Court declared state laws against consensual sodomy by same-sex couples to be unconstitutional, in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:32 pm
US v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:14 am
Regina (Preston) v Wandsworth London Borough Council and another [2012] EWCA Civ 1378 ; [2012] WLR (D) 295 “A British citizen who had not been resident in the United Kingdom for over 15 years could not vote in the United Kingdom parliamentary election within the meaning of section 1(3) of the Representation of the People Act 1985, as amended. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:56 am
I know you do.'In response to questions about the adequacy of the appellate record, and whether the recorded proceedings (which, as stated, had been provided to Appellant by the trial court) had been transcribed, Appellant stated: 'I don't need to give you the universe of evidence in these proceedings. . . . [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 11:29 am
As a practical matter, however, the state's clearly going to have someone -- probably many people -- testify that the patient is still crazy and represents a danger to others. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
In August 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “court”) reconsidered its order in the case of SEC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:16 pm
The Court stated: "[W]e conclude a defendant asserting primary caregiver status must prove at a minimum that he or she (1) consistently provided caregiving, (2) independent of any assistance in taking medical marijuana, (3) at or before the time he or she assumed responsibility for assisting with medical marijuana. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Here is the abstract: In McDonald v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
"[9] "The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 10:08 am
The rulings come in People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:46 am
Take, for example, the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:58 am
Does v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
Several weeks later, it denied a similar request involving Nevada’s directive capping religious gatherings at 50 people in Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
