Search for: "Press v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 17,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2008, 10:44 pm
Prosecutors: Adams, et al, holding HEA 1042 unconstitutional, stating that the decision would not be appealed. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:08 am
Supreme Court today issued its ruling in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
Related Issues: Mass Surveillance TechnologiesState Surveillance & Human RightsState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
  Through its suit, GoldieBlox was seeking judicial confirmation that its commercial video, which features three young girls singing alternative lyrics to the the Beastie Boys' song Girls, while playing with a Rube Goldberg-style contraption, constitutes fair use as a parody of the original song.However, just days later, GoldieBlox changed its commercial to remove the Beastie Boys' song Girls and issued a press release directed at the Beastie… [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm by Gabriel Scheffler
For instance, in tweeting out an announcement of its proposed replacement for the Clean Power Plan vacated in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:09 am by Howard Friedman
Washington state's attorney general yesterday announced the filing of a consent decree (full text) in State of Washington v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in People of the State of New York v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
As reported by the Detroit Free Press, a Michigan state Court of Claims judge held this week that the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:45 am
The bill would codify portions of last year’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the biggest takings case of the year, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Also in the Times is a review of Speak Now: Marriage Equality on Trial: The Story of Hollingsworth v. [read post]