Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 1621 - 1640 of 7,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am by Joshua Matz
Ryan, a pending case on ineffective assistance of counsel on state collateral review. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:05 pm by Amy Howe
” Ian Smith weighs in on Evenwel v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
United States comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News Service. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
At this blog and the Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Orin Kerr examines the second question presented in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by James Bickford
United States, the other case to be argued this morning, and lays out the conflict implicit in Pepper: between utilitarian and retributivist approaches to sentencing. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Nabiha Syed
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer asks how professors should teach United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:03 am by Nabiha Syed
” Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire previews Sackett v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
" In his post on the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin discusses the possible reasons why the Solicitor General, in her petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
  Inforrm will be taking a summer break over the next two months and our next Law and Media Round Up will be in October. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:46 am by Nabiha Syed
At Concurring Opinions, Alan Chen considers whether the Roberts Court has a “First Amendment agenda,” in light of its decisions to grant cert. in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
Commentators continue to discuss Monday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]