Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 37,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am by Marty Lederman
As Ruthann Robson explains in her analysis for this blog, in its decision in Lane v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If all (or nearly all) of the instances reached by a federal statute involve actions by states that violate Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process, it shouldn’t matter how often those instances occur. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
Among the key decisions relied upon by the district court for reaching this conclusion was DiFelice v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Courts in other states reached the same conclusion in similar cases. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides free access to the Brief for Appellant in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:35 am by Jessica Arons
That strategy shifted, however, in 2019 when abortion opponents began to hope the Supreme Court would use a near-total ban to overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Taylor, Jan. 14, 2016, Washington State Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Samson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
Van Dyke dissented, arguing that his colleagues had “pull[ed] the plug on a case that – even now – still has some life in it” and that if they had reached the merits, Washington state’s map was indeed a racial gerrymander that “cannot survive strict scrutiny. [read post]