Search for: "Roberts v. United States"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 9,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:01 am
” On June 26, 2013, The Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm
Perhaps nothing at all, says this Court....Houston Public Media reports on the decision.Then in the other challenge to the Texas law, United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
United States—was its last full opinion of the October 2023 Term. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:25 am
(Apprendi v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
As Jason Cowart reports in the current issue of The Pomerantz Monitor, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of 2010, Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm
Robert E. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court held today by a 5-4 vote in Caperton v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Byrd Center for Legislative StudiesMicki Kaufman, CUNY Graduate Center, “Everything on Paper Will Be Used Against Me: Quantifying Kissinger”Billy Wayson, “Making Sense of Digital Information Using Qualitative Analysis SoftwareTom Faith, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Mapping the Foreign Relations of the United States Series”James Wyatt, Robert C. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:51 am
Solicitor General, the Court welcomes you to the performance of the important office that you have assumed, to represent the Government of the United States before this Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States, 541 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
The Senate Report accompanying the original bill confirmed this meaning: `The definition explicitly includes any officer or employee of the United States or any State or political subdivision of a State. . . . [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
(Attorney General Wirt for instance, opined in 1827 that the President could order the discontinuance of a “vexatio[us]” suit in the name of the United States if it was “wholly unfounded in law. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:07 pm
The decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:31 pm
Just consider the shellacking the OSG took in United States v. [read post]
