Search for: "S. T. "
Results 1621 - 1640
of 743,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has disbarred an attorney who accepted a fee while unlicensed leading to a felony conviction Janzen's license to practice law had been stricken from the membership rolls since September 20, 2004. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
In the board’s view, however, this aspect relates not to insufficiency of disclosure, but rather is to be evaluated in the assessment of inventive step. [3.1.6] Finally the board does not consider that the conclusions of T 137/01 on sufficiency of disclosure apply by analogy to the present case. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
District Court in Washington, D.C. to block AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
The decision T 587/98, therefore, is not considered to be particularly relevant to the present case. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:55 am
Why China Deals DON’T Get Done and China’s Foreign Company Double Standard. 2. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
The part I found most noteworthy concerns the opponent’s request for reimbursement of the appeal fee.[6.1] The OD held that “no opinion can be reached as to whether D3 is prima facie relevant or not and hence exercises discretion and decides not to allow the novelty objection based on D3 into the proceedings (R 116). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
R 50(3) and by analogy R 86, which establish the requirement that documents filed in the examining or opposition procedure be signed, do not in the board’s opinion directly apply to third party observations. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
The EP parent application, which is cited as D3, also describes P1's species and is thus, at least in as far as pertaining to this species, entitled to the earliest priority date P1. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
In the board’s view, no such special reasons are apparent and remittal is thus appropriate. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
The opponent appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division to reject his opposition.All the claims of the Italian priority application were directed to a method for determining the recirculation value of a suspension. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
I find this decision interesting because it shows that there are disclaimer-transmitted diseases (DTD): a disclaimer may transmit a deficiency such as a lack of clarity from the disclaimed prior art to the claim comprising the disclaimer.The appeal was directed against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the patent.Claim 1 before the Board read (in English translation):The use of an adhesive tape having a tape-like backing of non-woven material, which is coated on at least one side… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
This decision deals with an appeal against the revocation of the patent by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal of the opponent after the patent had been maintained in amended form by the Opposition Division (OD).In what follows, the Board discusses the question of whether the ground of insufficiency of disclosure was already in the proceedings.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] In the present case the objection of the opponent regarding insufficient diclosure was discussed by both parties several times during the proceedings before the OD (see the minutes of the oral… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
T 59/87 and T 604/01). [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
The SGA and the reply shall contain a party’s complete case (Article 12(2) RPBA). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm
But the Liberals aren’t so ready to let the Conservatives push through their “tough on crime” agenda. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:51 pm
It appears Marine General Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff doesn't subscribe to the Military's "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy as it applies to homosexuals. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:10 am
The Appellate Division, First Department, doesn't think so.In Litwack v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 7:12 am
The president doesn’t want to eliminate the Senate’s 60-vote threshold, an impediment to major legislation. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:40 am
"AT&T lawyers don't read court docket, can't appeal $40M patent verdict; Missed the deadline to appeal 2014's biggest win for a 'non-practicing entity'": Joe Mullin of Ars Technica has this report. [read post]
