Search for: "SMITH v. STATE" Results 1621 - 1640 of 9,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 US 496,… [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am by INFORRM
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:23 am by Liskow & Lewis
By Kevin Connolly On an issue of apparent national first impression, the Houston Court of Appeals, in XTO Energy Inc. v. [read post]