Search for: "STATE v BRADY" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Different states have different practices, but in Texas (and 10 other states) DNA swabs are taken upon arrest and entered into the system. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Besides the scope of the Brady decision, the new review will no doubt examine the impact on ranking prosecutorial officials of Giglio v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:01 am
The 9th also found no Brady violations.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
Why should that prosecutor (or the State) be immune from suit? [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:27 am
Engstrom, Quarles & Brady LLP and Nicholas Seay, we find one of the rare state court patent legal malpractice cases. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:22 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Failure to Disclose Cooperating Witness' Lies At Proffer Session Immaterial, Not 'Brady' Breach United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bland, No. 06-3223 Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) there was no Brady violation since evidence suppressed by the prosecution was not material to an issue at defendant's trial; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an independent in camera review of the evidence in question. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
On state post-conviction review, the Tennessee courts refused to consider petitioner's claim under Brady v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Milligan's testimony was in obtaining the conviction:2 1 Brady v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Parker, No. 05-5191 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) invalid waiver of petitioner's right to counsel; 2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; 3) Brady violations; 4) a failure to grant petitioner a separate trial from his co-defendant; 5) a due process violation due to admission of hair-matching evidence; 6) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; 7) denial of a state-court forum in which… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
Medtronic and Levine v. [read post]