Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 7,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 8:51 am
As Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion made clear, constitutional rights are not subject to a vote. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
Kennedy, supra at 1141; United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:41 am
Sotomayor asked Yarger whether the closer case is not Nebraska v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Kennedy, 991 S.W.2d 754 (Tenn. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am
Bandemer) or the First Amendment (Justice Kennedy's suggested alternative constitutional provision for assessing partisan gerrymandering claims in Vieth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:09 pm
J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–C, IV, and V, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court in Michigan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
Holder, and the two same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:28 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
Evans to United State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
The Supreme Court of the United States today decided United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm
I suspect Justice Kennedy will vote to uphold the mandate given his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:14 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Many facets of Wednesday’s oral argument in the Fisher v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
In the meantime, the retirement of Justice Kennedy was a bad break for Knick, because Kennedy was one of four justices who joined a 2005 concurring opinion urging the Court to consider overruling Williamson County. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
For this reason, Kennedy explains, the Court was wrong in Bowers v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:40 am
Today the James Madison Center filed this application for a stay of the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding state law barring corporate independent spending in state elections. [read post]
