Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2015, 5:39 pm
”  The predominant purpose test asks “whether (the contract’s) predominant factor, (its) thrust, (its) purpose, reasonably stated, is the rendition of service, with goods incidentally involved (e.g., contract with artist for painting) or is a transaction of sale, labor incidentally involved (e.g., installation of a water heater in a bathroom). [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kelly Mihocik
In Stein v. hhgregg, a split panel of the Sixth Circuit held that a written policy would trump the company’s actual practices. hhGregg employs retail sales employees that are paid under a “draw-on-commission policy. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:03 pm by Thomas DeLorenzo
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kelly Mihocik
In Stein v. hhgregg, a split panel of the Sixth Circuit held that a written policy would trump the company’s actual practices. hhGregg employs retail sales employees that are paid under a “draw-on-commission policy. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:41 am by Kate Fort
NWS may not evade the public policy embodied in the MSA, the Escrow Statute, and the Complementary Act and thereby shift the burden of tobacco-related health care costs to the State. [read post]
  Thereafter, the statute requires the President to impose a number of sanctions relating to (i) foreign assistance, (ii) arms sales, (iii) arms sales financing, (iv) denial of US credit assistance (e.g., Export-Import Bank loans) and (v) a prohibition on exports of any controlled goods. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
State Claims Against Hedge Funds Survive SLUSA ChallengeThe Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act did not preempt state claims against the directors and administrators of two defunct hedge funds (Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]